*Some guidelines for TACTICAL QUESTIONING for the created unit personnel:
*Tactical questioning.
Generally soldiers conduct two types of collection--passive and
active. On the whole soldiers should practice the former generally when
they are not asked to look for prioritized information..which are
generally the domain of trained collectors, say HUMINT
specialists(active collection).Passive collection should be practiced
by each and every soldier if time allows or opportunity presents itself--say a
casual query to a local , or elicitation or during patrolling when you
project a friendly attitude in the local community and during
conversation you glean information of tactical value.
Active collection:-During tactical operations in a COIN environment for example, actionable intelligence and follow-on missions to kill/capture is depend a great deal on the soldier-on-the-ground--the tactical questioning ability of the latter. In such operations, say after a fire-fight,once
the operation is over and the prisoners taken and the area secured, the
local populace is rounded up and questioned for further leads or to
identify any insurgent in hiding among the populace by observing his
demeanor on questioning. In yet another scenario, say post-IED blast,
again the locals can be questioned. Clues may surface, say there was
this stranger who had visited the area just prior to the blast, wearing
such and such clothes and travelling on a motorcycle with license plate
number of a different city. Maybe that person is still in the village.
He is picked up, interrogated and a wealth of information extracted
which could be valuable actionable intelligence, driving further
operations. In other instances of tactical questioning, routine
patrolling to villages or areas of interest near the military area can
yield good intelligence after contact is established with the local
population. They might offer information on the daily activities of
suspects and their possible whereabouts.
The
intelligence unit which was just set up has as its main control center
the ACE. The ACE hands out the tasks to the various specialized
personnel to conduct active collection operations--tactical
querstioning,interrogation,debriefing,interviewing and
DOCEX.Specialised personnel are needed because the average soldier will
not be able to probe with specially designed questions or have a
technical mindset characteristic of HUMINT/CI agents.
Some steps for TQ:
Plan
in advance. For that you need to know the intelligence requirements as
laid down by the collection manager or ACE. The scenario can be
ascertaining certain facts of the enemy from a local: What did he
exactly see? Whom did he see? Does he know him or is he a stranger?
What was he wearing? Anything out of the ordinary in his attire? Was it uniform-like? Was he dressed in expensive outfit? Did it look like his clothes were concealing weapons? Maybe his jacket was too heavy--bomb strapped inside to his body? Which way did he go? Other men were there with him? This way you should probe him--always open-ended questions instead of yes/no questions.
Note
a difference here. We are simply questioning him directly instead of
first planning an approach like the interrogator. In certain situations
time is of essence. We need actionable intelligence straightaway. As
the insurgent group needs to be dealt with immediately and he/they are
nearby with intent to mount an attack on our forces in the immediate
future. And they sometimes take sanctuary in this village by mixing
with the crowd or maybe they this village is a permanent node in their
passage route to their safe havens. Tactical questioning is a direct approach.
We
can set templates for tactical questioning. That is a typical list of
questions fitting a typical scenario. So we brainstorm several
scenarios beforehand and have a good list of questions. Brainstorming
beforehand means much before any imminent operation, not that we have
need for actionable intelligence in 24 hours, and we set down to
brainstorm questions. The templates are the task of the research people
at the ACE.
Going by ACE requirements--the intelligence requirements--can prove
to be a very good tactical questioning operation. This is where
technical control becomes important. In tactical questioning one should
adhere to ACE requirements and question directly, open-endedly.The ACE
might be needing a composition, strength and disposition report of the
insurgents. Who do you think was the leader of that suspicious group
you saw in so and so place? How many of them were there? There were
women; we have information. Now how many women were there with them?
Were they armed? Do you have any idea about the maker of weapons? Fine
you don’t know how did the weapons look like? Rifle-type or
is it like this I am carrying? Or is it like the one you see with the
local police? Do you have any idea where they can get accommodation?
Anyone having a place of stay here who usually gives it out only to
people from outside your area?
The
ACE might be looking for possible targets of attack by the insurgents.
This is a way of predicting future attacks by analyzing soft targets.
Well do you think the religious structure will
be
bombed by the insurgent/terrorist? If so, why? You are the better
judge, aren’t there any other more important possible targets, the
bombing of which can cause good loss in life and more important than
that cause widespread panic and media attention? And so on.
During
the course of tactical questioning often the collector lands up with
sources that have good placement and access to the required
information. The collector refers his data to the ACE who register his
name and bio in the source database and also update the target folder
with this particular source giving information on a particular target.